Paper detail

On the convergence of Maronna's $M$-estimators of scatter

In this paper, {we propose an alternative proof for the uniqueness} of Maronna's $M$-estimator of scatter (Maronna, 1976) for $N$ vector observations $\mathbf y_1,...,\mathbf y_N\in\mathbb R^m$ under a mild constraint of linear independence of any subset of $m$ of these vectors. This entails in particular almost sure uniqueness for random vectors $\mathbf y_i$ with a density as long as $N>m$. {This approach allows to establish further relations that demonstrate that a properly normalized Tyler's $M$-estimator of scatter (Tyler, 1987) can be considered as a limit of Maronna's $M$-estimator. More precisely, the contribution is to show that each $M$-estimator converges towards a particular Tyler's $M$-estimator.} These results find important implications in recent works on the large dimensional (random matrix) regime of robust $M$-estimation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.