Paper detail

On the constants in a Kato inequality for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations

We continue an analysis, started in [10], of some issues related to the incompressible Euler or Navier-Stokes (NS) equations on a d-dimensional torus T^d. More specifically, we consider the quadratic term in these equations; this arises from the bilinear map (v, w) -> v . D w, where v, w : T^d -> R^d are two velocity fields. We derive upper and lower bounds for the constants in some inequalities related to the above bilinear map; these bounds hold, in particular, for the sharp constants G_{n d} = G_n in the Kato inequality | < v . D w | w >_n | <= G_n || v ||_n || w ||^2_n, where n in (d/2 + 1, + infinity) and v, w are in the Sobolev spaces H^n, H^(n+1) of zero mean, divergence free vector fields of orders n and n+1, respectively. As examples, the numerical values of our upper and lower bounds are reported for d=3 and some values of n. When combined with the results of [10] on another inequality, the results of the present paper can be employed to set up fully quantitative error estimates for the approximate solutions of the Euler/NS equations, or to derive quantitative bounds on the time of existence of the exact solutions with specified initial data; a sketch of this program is given.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.