Paper detail

On the Confidentiality of Information Dispersal Algorithms and Their Erasure Codes

\emph{Information Dispersal Algorithms (IDAs)} have been widely applied to reliable and secure storage and transmission of data files in distributed systems. An IDA is a method that encodes a file $F$ of size $L=|F|$ into $n$ unrecognizable pieces $F_1$, $F_2$, ..., $F_n$, each of size $L/m$ ($m<n$), so that the original file $F$ can be reconstructed from any $m$ pieces. The core of an IDA is the adopted non-systematic $m$-of-$n$ erasure code. This paper makes a systematic study on the \emph{confidentiality} of an IDA and its connection with the adopted erasure code. Two levels of confidentiality are defined: \emph{weak confidentiality} (in the case where some parts of the original file $F$ can be reconstructed explicitly from fewer than $m$ pieces) and \emph{strong confidentiality} (in the case where nothing of the original file $F$ can be reconstructed explicitly from fewer than $m$ pieces). For an IDA that adopts an arbitrary non-systematic erasure code, its confidentiality may fall into weak confidentiality. To achieve strong confidentiality, this paper explores a sufficient and feasible condition on the adopted erasure code. Then, this paper shows that Rabin's IDA has strong confidentiality. At the same time, this paper presents an effective way to construct an IDA with strong confidentiality from an arbitrary $m$-of-$(m+n)$ erasure code. Then, as an example, this paper constructs an IDA with strong confidentiality from a Reed-Solomon code, the computation complexity of which is comparable to or sometimes even lower than that of Rabin's IDA.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.