Paper detail

On the complex branch points in $πN$ scattering amplitude and the multiple poles feature of resonances

A simple heuristic argument to understand the existence of complex branch points in the $πN$ scattering amplitude is presented. It is based on a hypothesis that the singularity structure of the $πN$ scattering amplitude is a smooth varying function of the pion mass. We then show that the two-pole structure found to correspond to the Roper resonance could just a simple direct mathematical consequence of including additional Riemann surface in the analysis. Our study indicates that it is always possible to have multiple poles, either two or four etc., in different Riemann sheet, to be associated with a resonance. The poles in all Riemann sheets should be looked for to determine whether the two-pole feature of the Roper resonance $N^*(1440)$ is a manifestation of the "exact degeneracy" discussed here but masked by numerical indeterminacy, or an "accidental" one. The determination of the multiplicity of a pole could provide some information of the analytical structure of the numerator of the pole term, as the numerator of the pole term is related to resonance form factor.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.