Paper detail

On the Capacity of the Beta-Binomial Channel Model for Multi-Level Cell Flash Memories

The beta-binomial (BBM) channel model was recently proposed to model the overdispersed statistics of empirically observed bit errors in multi-level cell (MLC) flash memories. In this paper, we study the capacity of the BBM channel model for MLC flash memories. Using the compound channel approach, we first show that the BBM channel model capacity is zero. However, through empirical observation, this appears to be a very pessimistic estimate of the flash memory channel capacity. We propose a refined channel model called the truncated-support beta-binomial (TS-BBM) channel model and derive its capacity. Using empirical error statistics from 1X-nm and 2Y-nm MLC flash memories, we numerically estimate the TS-BBM channel model capacity as a function of the program/erase (P/E) cycling stress. The capacity of the 2-TS-BBM channel model provides an upper bound on the coding rates for the flash memory chip assuming a single binary error correction code is used.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.