Paper detail

On the calibration of Astigmatism particle tracking velocimetryfor suspensions of different volume fractions

In the present study we demonstrate for the first time how Astigmatism Particle Tracking Velocimetry (APTV) can be utilized to measure suspensions dynamics. Measurements were successfully performed in monodisperse, refractive index matched suspensions of up to a volume fraction of $Φ=19.9\%$. For this, a small percentage of the particles is labeled with fluorescent dye acting as tracers for the particle tracking procedure. Calibration results show, that a slight deviation of the refractive index of liquid and particles leads to a strong shape change of the calibration curve with respect to the unladen case. This effect becomes more severe along the channel height. To compensate the shape change of the calibration curves the interpolation technique developed by Brockmann et al. (Experiments in Fluids, 61(2), 67, \citeyear{brockmann2020utilizing}) is adapted. Using this technique, the interpolation procedure is applied to suspensions with 6 different volume fractions ranging from $Φ<0.01\%$ to $Φ=19.9\%$. To determine the effect of volume fraction on the perfomance of the method, the depth reconstruction error $σ_z$ and the measurement volume depth $Δz$, obtained in different calibration measurements, are estimated. Here, a relative position reconstruction accuracy of $σ_z$/$Δz$=0.90\% and $σ_z$/$Δz$=2.53\% is achieved for labeled calibration particles in dilute ($Φ<0.01\%$) and semi-dilute ($Φ\approx19.9\%$) suspensions, respectively. The measurement technique is validated for a laminar flow in a straight rectangular channel with a cross-sectional area of 2.55$\times$30\,mm$^2$. Uncertainties of 1.39\% and 3.34\% for the in-plane and 9.04\% and 22.57\% for the out-of-plane velocity with respect to the maximum streamwise velocity are achieved, at solid volume fractions of $Φ<0.01\%$ and $Φ=19.9\%$, respectively.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.