Paper detail

On The Boundedness of Bi-parameter Littlewood-Paley $g_λ^{*}$-function

Let $m,n\ge 1$ and $g_{λ_1,λ_2}^*$ be the bi-parameter Littlewood-Paley $g_λ^{*}$-function defined by $$ g_{λ_1,λ_2}^*(f)(x)= \bigg(\iint_{\R^{m+1}_{+}} \big(\frac{t_2}{t_2 + |x_2 - y_2|}\big)^{m λ_2} \iint_{\R^{n+1}_{+}} \big(\frac{t_1}{t_1 + |x_1 - y_1|}\big)^{n λ_1}|θ_{t_1,t_2} f(y_1,y_2)|^2 \frac{dy_1 dt_1}{t_1^{n+1}} \frac{dy_2 dt_2}{t_2^{m+1}} \bigg)^{1/2}, λ_1>1,\quad λ_2>1 $$ where $θ_{t_1,t_2} f$ is a non-convolution kernel defined on $\mathbb{R}^{m+n}$. In this paper, we showed that the bi-parameter Littlewood-Paley function $g_{λ_1,λ_2}^*$ was bounded from $L^2(\R^{n+m})$ to $L^2(\R^{n+m})$. This was done by means of probabilistic methods and by using a new averaging identity over good double Whitney regions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.