On Symplectic Periods for Inner forms of GLn{\rm GL}_n

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

In this paper we study the question of determining when an irreducible admissible representation of GLn(D){\rm GL}_n(D) admits a symplectic model, that is when such a representation has a linear functional invariant under Spn(D){\rm Sp}_n(D), where DD is a quaternion division algebra over a non-Archimedian local field kk and Spn(D){\rm Sp}_{n}(D) is the unique non-split inner form of the symplectic group Sp2n(k){\rm Sp}_{2n}(k). We show that if a representation has a symplectic model it is necessarily unique. For GL2(D){\rm GL}_2(D) we completely classify those representations which have a symplectic model. Globally, we show that if a discrete automorphic representation of GLn(DA){\rm GL}_{n}(D_\mathbb{A}) has a non-zero period for Spn(DA){\rm Sp}_{n}(D_\mathbb{A}), then its Jacquet-Langlands lift also has a non-zero symplectic period. A somewhat striking difference between distinction question for GL2n(k){\rm GL}_{2n}(k), and GLn(D){\rm GL}_n(D)(with respect to Sp2n(k){\rm Sp}_{2n}(k) and Spn(D){\rm Sp}_n(D) resp.) is that there are supercuspidal representations of GLn(D){\rm GL}_n(D) which are distinguished by Spn(D){\rm Sp}_n(D). The paper ends by formulating a general question classifying all unitary distinguished representations of GLn(D){\rm GL}_n(D), and proving a part of the local conjectures through a global conjecture.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.