Source author record

Mahendra Kumar Verma

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

physics.flu-dyn physics.geo-ph math.NT math.RT physics.plasm-ph

Catalog footprint

Research overview

4works

5topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2020arXiv

Enstrophy transfers in helical turbulence

In this paper we study the enstrophy transers in helical turbulence using direct numerical simulation. We observe that the helicity injection does not have significant effects on the inertial-range energy and helicity spectra ( $\sim k^{-5/3}$ ) and fluxes (constants). We also calculate the separate contributions to enstrophy transfers via velocity to vorticity and vorticity to vorticity channels. There are four different enstrophy fluxes associated with the former channel or vorticity stretching, and one flux associated with the latter channel or vorticity advection. In the inertial range, the fluxes due to vorticity stretching are larger than that due to advection. These transfers too are insensitive to helicity injection.

preprint2020arXiv

Inverse cascade of energy in helical turbulence

Using direct numerical simulation of hydrodynamic turbulence with helicity forcing applied at all scales, a near-maximum helical turbulent state is obtained, with an inverse energy cascade at scales larger than the energy forcing scale and a forward helicity cascade at scales smaller than the energy forcing scale. In contrast to previous studies using decimated triads, our simulations contain all possible triads. By computing the shell-to-shell energy fluxes, we show that the inverse energy cascade results from weakly non-local interactions among homochiral triads. Varying the helicity injection range of scales leads to necessary conditions to obtain an inverse energy cascade.

preprint2020arXiv

On uniqueness of transfer rates in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

In hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, expressions for the transfer rates rely on integrals over wavenumber triads $(\textbf{k,p,q})$ satisfying $\textbf{k+p+q=0}$ . As an example $S_E^{uu}(\textbf{k|p,q})$ denotes the kinetic energy transfer rate to the mode $\textbf{k}$ , from the two other modes in the triad, $\textbf{p}$ and $\textbf{q}$ . As noted by Kraichnan (1958), in $S_E^{uu}(\textbf{k|p,q})$ , what fraction of the energy transferred to the mode $\textbf{k}$ originated from $\textbf{p}$ and which from $\textbf{q}$ is unknown . Such an expression is thus incongruent with the customary description of turbulence in terms of two-scale energy exchange. Notwithstanding this issue, Dar etal. (2001) further decomposed these transfers into separate contributions from $\textbf{p}$ -to- $\textbf{k}$ and $\textbf{q}$ -to- $\textbf{k}$ , thus introducing the concept of mode-to-mode transfers that they applied to MHD turbulence. Doing so, they had to set aside additional transfers circulating within each triad, but failed to calculate them. In the present paper we explain how to derive the complete expressions of the mode-to-mode transfers, including the circulating transfers. We do it for kinetic energy and kinetic helicity in hydrodynamic turbulence, for kinetic energy, magnetic energy and magnetic helicity in MHD turbulence. Separating the contribution of magnetic advection from magnetic stretching, the energy mode-to-mode transfer rates involving the magnetic field become uniquely defined, in striking contrast to the hydrodynamic case. The magnetic helicity mode-to-mode transfer rate is also found to be uniquely defined, contrary to kinetic helicity in hydrodynamics. We find that shell-to-shell transfer rates have the same properties as mode-to-mode transfer rates. Finally calculating the fluxes, we show how the circulating transfers cancel in accordance with conservation laws.

preprint2014arXiv

On Symplectic Periods for Inner forms of ${\rm GL}_n$

In this paper we study the question of determining when an irreducible admissible representation of ${\rm GL}_n(D)$ admits a symplectic model, that is when such a representation has a linear functional invariant under ${\rm Sp}_n(D)$ , where $D$ is a quaternion division algebra over a non-Archimedian local field $k$ and ${\rm Sp}_{n}(D)$ is the unique non-split inner form of the symplectic group ${\rm Sp}_{2n}(k)$ . We show that if a representation has a symplectic model it is necessarily unique. For ${\rm GL}_2(D)$ we completely classify those representations which have a symplectic model. Globally, we show that if a discrete automorphic representation of ${\rm GL}_{n}(D_\mathbb{A})$ has a non-zero period for ${\rm Sp}_{n}(D_\mathbb{A})$ , then its Jacquet-Langlands lift also has a non-zero symplectic period. A somewhat striking difference between distinction question for ${\rm GL}_{2n}(k)$ , and ${\rm GL}_n(D)$ (with respect to ${\rm Sp}_{2n}(k)$ and ${\rm Sp}_n(D)$ resp.) is that there are supercuspidal representations of ${\rm GL}_n(D)$ which are distinguished by ${\rm Sp}_n(D)$ . The paper ends by formulating a general question classifying all unitary distinguished representations of ${\rm GL}_n(D)$ , and proving a part of the local conjectures through a global conjecture.

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Mahendra Kumar Verma

Research overview

Is this your work?

4 publications

Enstrophy transfers in helical turbulence

Inverse cascade of energy in helical turbulence

On uniqueness of transfer rates in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

On Symplectic Periods for Inner forms of ${\rm GL}_n$

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

Mahendra Kumar Verma

Research overview

Is this your work?

4 publications

Enstrophy transfers in helical turbulence

Inverse cascade of energy in helical turbulence

On uniqueness of transfer rates in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

On Symplectic Periods for Inner forms of GLn{\rm GL}_nGLn​

See the researcher in context

Building this map preview

On Symplectic Periods for Inner forms of ${\rm GL}_n$