Paper detail

On stellated spheres, shellable balls, lower bounds and a combinatorial criterion for tightness

We introduce the $k$-stellated spheres and compare and contrast them with $k$-stacked spheres. It is shown that for $d \geq 2k$, any $k$-stellated sphere of dimension $d$ bounds a unique and canonically defined $k$-stacked ball. In parallel, any $k$-stacked polytopal sphere of dimension $d\geq 2k$ bounds a unique and canonically defined $k$-stacked ball. We consider the class ${\cal W}_k(d)$ of combinatorial $d$-manifolds with $k$-stellated links. For $d\geq 2k+2$, any member of ${\cal W}_k(d)$ bounds a unique and canonically defined "$k$-stacked" $(d+1)$-manifold. We introduce the mu-vector of simplicial complexes, and show that the mu-vector of any 2-neighbourly simplicial complex dominates its vector of Betti numbers componentwise, and the two vectors are equal precisely when the complex is tight. When $d\geq 2k$, we are able to estimate/compute certain alternating sums of the mu-numbers of any 2-neighbourly member of ${\cal W}_k(d)$. This leads to a lower bound theorem for such triangulated manifolds. As an application, it is shown that any $(k+1)$-neighbourly member of ${\cal W}_k(d)$ is tight, subject only to an extra condition on the $k^{th}$ Betti number in case $d=2k+1$. This result more or less settles a recent conjecture of Effenberger, and it also provides a uniform and conceptual tightness proof for all the known tight triangulated manifolds, with only two exceptions. It is shown that any polytopal upper bound sphere of odd dimension $2k+1$ belongs to the class ${\cal W}_k(2k+1)$, thus generalizing a theorem due to Perles. This shows that the case $d=2k+1$ is indeed exceptional for the tightness theorem.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.