On stellated spheres, shellable balls, lower bounds and a combinatorial criterion for tightness

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Abstract

We introduce the kk-stellated spheres and compare and contrast them with kk-stacked spheres. It is shown that for d≥2kd \geq 2k, any kk-stellated sphere of dimension dd bounds a unique and canonically defined kk-stacked ball. In parallel, any kk-stacked polytopal sphere of dimension d≥2kd\geq 2k bounds a unique and canonically defined kk-stacked ball. We consider the class Wk(d){\cal W}_k(d) of combinatorial dd-manifolds with kk-stellated links. For d≥2k+2d\geq 2k+2, any member of Wk(d){\cal W}_k(d) bounds a unique and canonically defined "kk-stacked" (d+1)(d+1)-manifold. We introduce the mu-vector of simplicial complexes, and show that the mu-vector of any 2-neighbourly simplicial complex dominates its vector of Betti numbers componentwise, and the two vectors are equal precisely when the complex is tight. When d≥2kd\geq 2k, we are able to estimate/compute certain alternating sums of the mu-numbers of any 2-neighbourly member of Wk(d){\cal W}_k(d). This leads to a lower bound theorem for such triangulated manifolds. As an application, it is shown that any (k+1)(k+1)-neighbourly member of Wk(d){\cal W}_k(d) is tight, subject only to an extra condition on the kthk^{th} Betti number in case d=2k+1d=2k+1. This result more or less settles a recent conjecture of Effenberger, and it also provides a uniform and conceptual tightness proof for all the known tight triangulated manifolds, with only two exceptions. It is shown that any polytopal upper bound sphere of odd dimension 2k+12k+1 belongs to the class Wk(2k+1){\cal W}_k(2k+1), thus generalizing a theorem due to Perles. This shows that the case d=2k+1d=2k+1 is indeed exceptional for the tightness theorem.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.