On stellated spheres and a tightness criterion for combinatorial manifolds

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Abstract

We introduce the kk-stellated spheres and consider the class Wk(d){\cal W}_k(d) of triangulated dd-manifolds all whose vertex links are kk-stellated, and its subclass Wk∗(d){\cal W}^{\ast}_k(d) consisting of the (k+1)(k+1)-neighbourly members of Wk(d){\cal W}_k(d). We introduce the mu-vector of any simplicial complex and show that, in the case of 2-neighbourly simplicial complexes, the mu-vector dominates the vector of its Betti numbers componentwise; the two vectors are equal precisely for tight simplicial complexes. We are able to estimate/compute certain alternating sums of the components of the mu-vector of any 2-neighbourly member of Wk(d){\cal W}_k(d) for d≥2kd\geq 2k. As one consequence of this theory, we prove a lower bound theorem for such triangulated manifolds, as well as determine the integral homology type of members of Wk∗(d){\cal W}^{\ast}_k(d) for d≥2k+2d \geq 2k+2. As another application, we prove that, when d≠2k+1d \neq 2k+1, all members of Wk∗(d){\cal W}^{\ast}_k(d) are tight. We also characterize the tight members of Wk∗(2k+1){\cal W}^{\ast}_k(2k + 1) in terms of their kthk^{\rm th} Betti numbers. These results more or less answer a recent question of Effenberger, and also provide a uniform and conceptual tightness proof for all except two of the known tight triangulated manifolds. We also prove a lower bound theorem for triangulated manifolds in which the members of W1(d){\cal W}_1(d) provide the equality case. This generalises a result (the d=4d=4 case) due to Walkup and Kuehnel. As a consequence, it is shown that every tight member of W1(d){\cal W}_1(d) is strongly minimal, thus providing substantial evidence in favour of a conjecture of Kuehnel and Lutz asserting that tight triangulated manifolds should be strongly minimal.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.