Paper detail

On several problems about automorphisms of the free group of rank two

Let $F_n$ be a free group of rank $n$. In this paper we discuss three algorithmic problems related to automorphisms of $F_2$. A word $u$ of $F_n$ is called positive if $u$ does not have negative exponents. A word $u$ in $F_n$ is called potentially positive if $ϕ(u)$ is positive for some automorphism $ϕ$ of $F_n$. We prove that there is an algorithm to decide whether or not a given word in $F_2$ is potentially positive, which gives an affirmative solution to problem F34a in [1] for the case of $F_2$. Two elements $u$ and $v$ in $F_n$ are said to be boundedly translation equivalent if the ratio of the cyclic lengths of $ϕ(u)$ and $ϕ(v)$ is bounded away from 0 and from $\infty$ for every automorphism $ϕ$ of $F_n$. We provide an algorithm to determine whether or not two given elements of $F_2$ are boundedly translation equivalent, thus answering question F38c in the online version of [1] for the case of $F_2$. We further prove that there exists an algorithm to decide whether or not a given finitely generated subgroup of $F_2$ is the fixed point group of some automorphism of $F_2$, which settles problem F1b in [1] in the affirmative for the case of $F_2$.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.