Paper detail

On rooted cluster morphisms and cluster structures in $2$-Calabi-Yau triangulated categories

We study rooted cluster algebras and rooted cluster morphisms which were introduced in \cite{ADS13} recently and cluster structures in $2$-Calabi-Yau triangulated categories. An example of rooted cluster morphism which is not ideal is given, this clarifies a doubt in \cite{ADS13}. We introduce the notion of frozenization of a seed and show that an injective rooted cluster morphism always arises from a frozenization and a subseed. Moreover, it is a section if and only if it arises from a subseed. This answers the Problem 7.7 in \cite{ADS13}. We prove that an inducible rooted cluster morphism is ideal if and only if it can be decomposed as a surjective rooted cluster morphism and an injective rooted cluster morphism. We also introduce the tensor decompositions of a rooted cluster algebra and of a rooted cluster morphism. For rooted cluster algebras arising from a $2$-Calabi-Yau triangulated category $\mathcal{C}$ with cluster tilting objects, we give an one-to-one correspondence between certain pairs of their rooted cluster subalgebras which we call complete pairs (see Definition \ref{def of complete pairs} for precise meaning) and cotorsion pairs in $\mathcal{C}$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.