Paper detail

On regular polytopes

Regular polytopes, the generalization of the five Platonic solids in 3 space dimensions, exist in arbitrary dimension $n\geq-1$; now in {\rm dim}. 2, 3 and 4 there are \emph{extra} polytopes, while in general dimensions only the hyper-tetrahedron, the hyper-cube and its dual hyper-octahedron exist. We attribute these peculiarites and exceptions to special properties of the orthogonal groups in these dimensions: the $\mathrm{SO}(2)=\mathrm{U}(1)$ group being (abelian and) \emph{divisible}, is related to the existence of arbitrarily-sided plane regular polygons, and the \emph{splitting} of the Lie algebra of the $\mathrm{O}(4)$ group will be seen responsible for the Schläfli special polytopes in 4-dim., two of which percolate down to three. In spite of {\rm dim}. 8 being also special (Cartan's \emph{triality}), we argue why there are no \emph{extra} polytopes, while it has other consequences: in particular the existence of the three \emph{division algebras} over the reals $\mathbb{R}$: complex $\mathbb{C}$, quaternions $\mathbb{H}$ and octonions $\mathbb{O}$ is seen also as another feature of the special properties of corresponding orthogonal groups, and of the spheres of dimension 0,1,3 and 7.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.