Paper detail

On Predictive Density Estimation for Location Families under Integrated $L_2$ and $L_1$ Losses

Our investigation concerns the estimation of predictive densities and a study of efficiency as measured by the frequentist risk of such predictive densities with integrated $L_2$ and $L_1$ losses. Our findings relate to a $p-$variate spherically symmetric observable $X \sim p_X(\|x-μ\|^2)$ and the objective of estimating the density of $Y \sim q_Y(\|y-μ\|^2)$ based on $X$. For $L_2$ loss, we describe Bayes estimation, minimum risk equivariant estimation (MRE), and minimax estimation. We focus on the risk performance of the benchmark minimum risk equivariant estimator, plug-in estimators, and plug-in type estimators with expanded scale. For the multivariate normal case, we make use of a duality result with a point estimation problem bringing into play reflected normal loss. In three of more dimensions (i.e., $p \geq 3$), we show that the MRE estimator is inadmissible under $L_2$ loss and provide dominating estimators. This brings into play Stein-type results for estimating a multivariate normal mean with a loss which is a concave and increasing function of $\|\hatμ-μ\|^2$. We also study the phenomenon of improvement on the plug-in density estimator of the form $q_Y(\|y-aX\|^2)\,, 0<a \leq 1\,,$ by a subclass of scale expansions $\frac{1}{c^p} \, q_Y(\|(y -aX)/c \|^2)$ with $c>1$, showing in some cases, inevitably for large enough $p$, that all choices $c>1$ are dominating estimators. Extensions are obtained for scale mixture of normals including a general inadmissibility result of the MRE estimator for $p \geq 3$. Finally, we describe and expand on analogous plug-in dominance results for spherically symmetric distributions with $p \geq 4$ under $L_1$ loss.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.