On Predictive Density Estimation for Location Families under Integrated L2L_2 and L1L_1 Losses

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

Our investigation concerns the estimation of predictive densities and a study of efficiency as measured by the frequentist risk of such predictive densities with integrated L2L_2 and L1L_1 losses. Our findings relate to a p−p-variate spherically symmetric observable X∼pX(∥x−μ∥2)X \sim p_X(\|x-μ\|^2) and the objective of estimating the density of Y∼qY(∥y−μ∥2)Y \sim q_Y(\|y-μ\|^2) based on XX. For L2L_2 loss, we describe Bayes estimation, minimum risk equivariant estimation (MRE), and minimax estimation. We focus on the risk performance of the benchmark minimum risk equivariant estimator, plug-in estimators, and plug-in type estimators with expanded scale. For the multivariate normal case, we make use of a duality result with a point estimation problem bringing into play reflected normal loss. In three of more dimensions (i.e., p≥3p \geq 3), we show that the MRE estimator is inadmissible under L2L_2 loss and provide dominating estimators. This brings into play Stein-type results for estimating a multivariate normal mean with a loss which is a concave and increasing function of ∥μ^−μ∥2\|\hatμ-μ\|^2. We also study the phenomenon of improvement on the plug-in density estimator of the form qY(∥y−aX∥2) ,0<a≤1 ,q_Y(\|y-aX\|^2)\,, 0<a \leq 1\,, by a subclass of scale expansions 1cp qY(∥(y−aX)/c∥2)\frac{1}{c^p} \, q_Y(\|(y -aX)/c \|^2) with c>1c>1, showing in some cases, inevitably for large enough pp, that all choices c>1c>1 are dominating estimators. Extensions are obtained for scale mixture of normals including a general inadmissibility result of the MRE estimator for p≥3p \geq 3. Finally, we describe and expand on analogous plug-in dominance results for spherically symmetric distributions with p≥4p \geq 4 under L1L_1 loss.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.