On post-Lie algebras structures coming from simply transitive NIL-affine actions

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Abstract

Given a simply connected solvable Lie group GG, there always exists NIL-affine action ρ:G→Aff⁡(H)ρ: G \to \operatorname{Aff}(H) on a nilpotent Lie group HH such that GG acts simply transitively. The question whether this is always possible for H=RnH = \mathbb{R}^n abelian was known as Milnor's question, with a negative answer due to a counterexample of Benoist. This counterexample is based on a correspondence between certain affine actions ρ:G→Aff⁡(Rn)ρ: G \to \operatorname{Aff}(\mathbb R^n) and left-symmetric structures on the corresponding Lie algebra g\mathfrak g of GG, where simply transitive actions correspond exactly to the so-called complete left-symmetric structures. In general however, the question remains open which solvable Lie groups GG can act on which nilpotent Lie groups HH. A natural candidate for a correspondence on the Lie algebra level is the notion of post-Lie algebra structures, which form the natural generalization of left-symmetric structures. In this paper, we show that every simply transitive NIL-affine action of GG on a nilpotent Lie group HH indeed induces a post-Lie algebra structure on the pair of Lie algebras (g,h)(\mathfrak g,\mathfrak h). Moreover, we discuss a new notion of completeness for these structures in the case that h\mathfrak h is 22-step nilpotent, equivalent but different from the known definition for H=RnH = \mathbb R^n. We then show that simply transitive actions exactly correspond to complete post-Lie algebra structures in the 22-step nilpotent case. However, the questions how to define completeness in higher nilpotency classes remains open, as we illustrate with an example in the 33-step nilpotent case.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.