Paper detail

On parametric and generic polynomials with one parameter

Given fields $k \subseteq L$, our results concern one parameter $L$-parametric polynomials over $k$, and their relation to generic polynomials. The former are polynomials $P(T,Y) \in k[T][Y]$ of group $G$ which parametrize all Galois extensions of $L$ of group $G$ via specialization of $T$ in $L$, and the latter are those which are $L$-parametric for every field $L \supseteq k$. We show, for example, that being $L$-parametric with $L$ taken to be the single field $\mathbb{C}((V))(U)$ is in fact sufficient for a polynomial $P(T, Y) \in \mathbb{C}[T][Y]$ to be generic. As a corollary, we obtain a complete list of one parameter generic polynomials over a given field of characteristic 0, complementing the classical literature on the topic. Our approach also applies to an old problem of Schinzel: subject to the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture, we provide one parameter families of affine curves over number fields, all with a rational point, but with no rational generic point.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.