Paper detail

On optimality of empirical risk minimization in linear aggregation

In the first part of this paper, we show that the small-ball condition, recently introduced by Mendelson (2015), may behave poorly for important classes of localized functions such as wavelets, piecewise polynomials or trigonometric polynomials, in particular leading to suboptimal estimates of the rate of convergence of ERM for the linear aggregation problem. In a second part, we recover optimal rates of covergence for the excess risk of ERM when the dictionary is made of trigonometric functions. Considering the bounded case, we derive the concentration of the excess risk around a single point, which is an information far more precise than the rate of convergence. In the general setting of a L2 noise, we finally refine the small ball argument by rightly selecting the directions we are looking at, in such a way that we obtain optimal rates of aggregation for the Fourier dictionary.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.