Paper detail

On Oceanic Rogue Waves

We propose a new conceptual framework for the prediction of rogue waves and third-order space-time extremes of wind seas that relies on the Tayfun (1980) and Janssen (2009) models coupled with Adler-Taylor (2009) theory on the Euler characteristics of random fields. Extreme statistics of the Andrea rogue wave event are examined capitalizing on European Reanalysis (ERA)-interim data. A refinement of Janssen's (2003) theory suggests that in realistic oceanic seas characterized by short-crested multidirectional waves, homogeneous and Gaussian initial conditions become irrelevant as the wave field adjusts to a non-Gaussian state dominated by bound nonlinearities over time scales $t\gg t_{c}\approx0.13T_{0}/νσ_θ$, where $T_{0}$, $ν$ and $σ_θ$ denote mean wave period, spectral bandwidth and angular spreading of dominant waves. For the Andrea storm, ERA-interim predictions yield $t_{c}/T_{0}\sim O(1)$ indicating that quasi-resonant interactions are negligible. Further, the mean maximum sea surface height expected over the Ekofisk platform's area is higher than that expected at a fixed point. However, both of these statistics underestimate the actual crest height $h_{obs}\sim1.63H_s$ observed at a point near the Ekofisk site, where $H_s$ is the significant wave height. To explain the nature of such extreme, we account for both skewness and kurtosis effects and consider the threshold $h_{q}$ exceeded with probability $q$ by the maximum surface height of a sea state over an area in time. We find that $h_{obs}$ nearly coincides with the threshold $h_{1/1000}\sim1.62H_s$ estimated at a point for a typical $3$-hour sea state, suggesting that the Andrea rogue wave is likely to be a rare occurrence in quasi-Gaussian seas.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.