Paper detail

On numerical broadening of particle size spectra: a condensational growth study using PyMPDATA

This work discusses the numerical aspects of representing the diffusional (condensational) growth in particulate systems such as atmospheric clouds. It focuses on the Eulerian modeling approach, in which the evolution of the particle size spectrum is carried out using a fixed-bin discretization associated with inherent numerical diffusion. Focus is on the applications of MPDATA numerical schemes (variants explored include: infinite-gauge, non-oscillatory, third-order-terms and recursive antidiffusive correction). Methodology for handling coordinate transformations associated with both particle size distribution variable choice and numerical grid layout are expounded. Analysis of the performance of the scheme is performed using: (i) an analytically solvable box-model test case, and (ii) the single-column "KiD" test case in which the size-spectral advection due to condensation is solved simultaneously with the spatial advection in the vertical physical coordinate, and in which the supersaturation evolution is coupled with the droplet growth through water mass budget. The single-column problem involves numerical solution of a two-dimensional advection problem (spectral and spatial dimensions). The box-model simulations demonstrate that, for the problem considered, even a tenfold decrease of the spurious numerical spectral broadening can be obtained by a proper choice of the MPDATA variant (maintaining the same spatial and temporal resolution), yet at an increased computational cost. Analyses using the single-column test case reveal that the width of the droplet size spectrum is affected by numerical diffusion pertinent to both spatial and spectral advection. Application of even a single corrective iteration of MPDATA robustly decreases the relative dispersion of the droplet spectrum, roughly by a factor of two at the levels of maximal liquid water content.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.