Paper detail

On moist potential temperatures and their ability to characterize differences in the properties of air parcels

A framework is introduced to compare moist `potential' temperatures. The equivalent potential temperature, $θ_e,$ the liquid water potential temperature, $θ_\ell,$ and the entropy potential temperature, $θ_s$, are all shown to be potential temperatures, in the sense that they measure the temperatures of certain reference state systems whose entropy is the same as that of the air-parcel. They only differ in the choice of reference state composition: $θ_\ell$ describes the temperature a condensate-free state, $θ_e$ a vapor-free state, and $θ_s$ a water-free state would require to have the same entropy as the given state. Although in this sense $θ_e,$ $θ_\ell,$ and $θ_s$ are all different flavors of the same thing, only $θ_\ell$ satisfies the stricter definition of a `potential temperature', as corresponding to a reference temperature accessible by an isentropic and closed transformation of a system in equilibrium; both $θ_e$ and $θ_\ell$ measure the `relative' enthalpy of an air parcel at their respective reference states; but only $θ_s$ measures air-parcel entropy. None mix linearly, but all do so approximately, and all reduce to the dry potential temperature, $θ$ in the limit as the water mass fraction goes to zero. As is well known, $θ$ does mix linearly and inherits all the favorable (entropic, enthalpic, and potential temperature) properties of its various -- but descriptively less rich -- moist counterparts. All, involve quite complex expressions, but admit relatively simple and useful approximations. Of the three moist `potential' temperatures, $θ_s$ is the least familiar, but the most well mixed in the broader tropics, a property that merits further study as a possible basis for constraining mixing processes.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.