Paper detail

On matrix-SIR Arino models with linear birth rate, loss of immunity, disease and vaccination fatalities, and their approximations

In this work we study the stability properties of the equilibrium points of deterministic epidemic models with nonconstant population size. Models with nonconstant population have been studied in the past only in particular cases, two of which we review and combine. Our main result shows that for simple "matrix epidemic models" introduced in [1], an explicit general formula for the reproduction number and the corresponding "weak stability alternative" still holds, under small modifications, for models with nonconstant population size, and even when the model allows for vaccination and loss of immunity. The importance of this result is clear once we note that the models of [1] include a large number of viral and bacterial models of epidemic propagation, including for example the totality of homogeneous COVID-19 models. To better understand the nature of the result, we emphasize that the models proposed in [1] and considered here are extensions of the SIR-PH model, which is essentially characterized by a phase-type distribution that models transitions between the "disease/infectious compartments". In these cases, the reproduction number and a certain Lyapunov function for the disease free equilibrium are explicitly expressible. Not surprisingly, accounting for varying demography, loss of immunity, and vaccinations lead to several challenges. One of the most important is that a varying population size leads to multiple endemic equilibrium points: this is in contrast with "classic models" which in general admit unique disease-free and endemic equilibria. As a special case of our analysis, we consider a "first approximation" (FA) of our model, which coincides with the constant-demography model often studied in the literature, and for which more explicit results are available. Furthermore, we propose a second heuristic approximation named "intermediate approximation" (IA).

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.