Paper detail

On matrix estimation under monotonicity constraints

We consider the problem of estimating an unknown $n_1 \times n_2$ matrix $\mathbf{θ^*}$ from noisy observations under the constraint that $\mathbfθ^*$ is nondecreasing in both rows and columns. We consider the least squares estimator (LSE) in this setting and study its risk properties. We show that the worst case risk of the LSE is $n^{-1/2}$, up to multiplicative logarithmic factors, where $n = n_1 n_2$ and that the LSE is minimax rate optimal (up to logarithmic factors). We further prove that for some special $\mathbfθ^*$, the risk of the LSE could be much smaller than $n^{-1/2}$; in fact, it could even be parametric i.e., $n^{-1}$ up to logarithmic factors. Such parametric rates occur when the number of "rectangular" blocks of $\mathbfθ^*$ is bounded from above by a constant. We derive, as a consequence, an interesting adaptation property of the LSE which we term variable adaptation -- the LSE performs as well as the oracle estimator when estimating a matrix that is constant along each row/column. Our proofs borrow ideas from empirical process theory and convex geometry and are of independent interest.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.