Paper detail

On malnormal peripheral subgroups in fundamental groups of 3-manifolds

Let $K$ be a non-trivial knot in the 3-sphere, $E_K$ its exterior, $G_K = π_1(E_K)$ its group, and $P_K = π_1(\partial E_K) \subset G_K$ its peripheral subgroup. We show that $P_K$ is malnormal in $G_K$, namely that $gP_Kg^{-1} \cap P_K = \{e\}$ for any $g \in G_K$ with $g \notin P_K$, unless $K$ is in one of the following three classes: torus knots, cable knots, and composite knots; these are exactly the classes for which there exist annuli in $E_K$ attached to $T_K$ which are not boundary parallel (Theorem 1 and Corollary 2). More generally, we characterise malnormal peripheral subgroups in the fundamental group of a compact orientable irreducible 3-manifold with boundary a non-empty union of tori (Theorem 3). Proofs are written with non-expert readers in mind. Half of our paper (Sections 7 to 10) is a reminder of some three-manifold topology as it flourished before the Thurston revolution. In a companion paper [HaWeOs], we collect general facts on malnormal subgroups and Frobenius groups, and we review a number of examples.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.