Paper detail

On leaky forcing and resilience

A leak is a vertex that is not allowed to perform a force during the zero forcing process. Leaky forcing was recently introduced as a new variation of zero forcing in order to analyze how leaks in a network disrupt the zero forcing process. The $\ell$-leaky forcing number of a graph is the size of the smallest zero forcing set that can force a graph despite $\ell$ leaks. A graph $G$ is $\ell$-resilient if its zero forcing number is the same as its $\ell$-leaky forcing number. In this paper, we analyze $\ell$-leaky forcing and show that if an $(\ell-1)$-leaky forcing set $B$ is robust enough, then $B$ is an $\ell$-leaky forcing set. This provides the framework for characterizing $\ell$-leaky forcing sets. Furthermore, we consider structural implications of $\ell$-resilient graphs. We apply these results to bound the $\ell$-leaky forcing number of several graph families including trees, supertriangles, and grid graphs. In particular, we resolve a question posed by Dillman and Kenter concerning the upper bound on the $1$-leaky forcing number of grid graphs.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.