BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Joseph S. Alameda

Joseph S. Alameda contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COmath.DSmath.PR

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

An upper bound for the $k$-power domination number in $r$-uniform hypergraphs

Generalizing work on graphs, Chang and Roussel introduced $k$-power domination in hypergraphs and conjectured the upper bound for the $k$-power domination number for $r$-uniform hypergraphs on $n$ vertices was $\frac{n}{r+k}$. This upper bound was shown to be true for simple graphs ($r=2$) and it was further conjectured that only a family of hypergraphs, known as the squid hypergraphs, attained this upper bound. In this paper, the conjecture is proven to hold for hypergraphs with $r=3$ or $4$; but is shown to be false, by a counterexample, for $r\geq 7$. Furthermore, we show that the squid hypergraphs are not the only hypergraphs that attain the original upper bound. Finally, a new upper bound is proven for $r\geq 3$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Cutoff in the Bernoulli-Laplace model with $O(n)$ swaps

This paper considers the $(n,k)$-Bernoulli--Laplace model in the case when there are two urns, the total number of red and white balls is the same, and the number of selections $k$ at each step is on the same asymptotic order as the number of balls $n$ in each urn. Our main focus is on the large-time behavior of the corresponding Markov chain tracking the number of red balls in a given urn. Under reasonable assumptions on the asymptotic behavior of the ratio $k/n$ as $n\rightarrow \infty$, cutoff in the total variation distance is established. A cutoff window is also provided. These results, in particular, partially resolve an open problem posed by Eskenazis and Nestoridi.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Generalizations of Leaky Forcing

Vertex leaky forcing was recently introduced as a new variation of zero forcing in order to show how vertex leaks can disrupt the zero forcing process in a graph. An edge leak is an edge that is not allowed to be forced across during the zero forcing process. The $\ell$-edge-leaky forcing number of a graph is the size of a smallest zero forcing set that can force the graph blue despite $\ell$ edge leaks. This paper contains an analysis of the effect of edge leaks on the zero forcing process instead of vertex leaks. Furthermore, specified $\ell$-leaky forcing is introduced. The main result is that $\ell$-leaky forcing, $\ell$-edge-leaky forcing, and specified $\ell$-leaky forcing are equivalent. Furthermore, all of these different kinds of leaks can be mixed so that vertex leaks, edge leaks, and specified leaks are used. This mixed $\ell$-leaky forcing number is also the same as the (vertex) $\ell$-leaky forcing number.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On leaky forcing and resilience

A leak is a vertex that is not allowed to perform a force during the zero forcing process. Leaky forcing was recently introduced as a new variation of zero forcing in order to analyze how leaks in a network disrupt the zero forcing process. The $\ell$-leaky forcing number of a graph is the size of the smallest zero forcing set that can force a graph despite $\ell$ leaks. A graph $G$ is $\ell$-resilient if its zero forcing number is the same as its $\ell$-leaky forcing number. In this paper, we analyze $\ell$-leaky forcing and show that if an $(\ell-1)$-leaky forcing set $B$ is robust enough, then $B$ is an $\ell$-leaky forcing set. This provides the framework for characterizing $\ell$-leaky forcing sets. Furthermore, we consider structural implications of $\ell$-resilient graphs. We apply these results to bound the $\ell$-leaky forcing number of several graph families including trees, supertriangles, and grid graphs. In particular, we resolve a question posed by Dillman and Kenter concerning the upper bound on the $1$-leaky forcing number of grid graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access