Paper detail

On $k$-stellated and $k$-stacked spheres

We introduce the class $Σ_k(d)$ of $k$-stellated (combinatorial) spheres of dimension $d$ ($0 \leq k \leq d + 1$) and compare and contrast it with the class ${\cal S}_k(d)$ ($0 \leq k \leq d$) of $k$-stacked homology $d$-spheres. We have $Σ_1(d) = {\cal S}_1(d)$, and $Σ_k(d) \subseteq {\cal S}_k(d)$ for $d \geq 2k - 1$. However, for each $k \geq 2$ there are $k$-stacked spheres which are not $k$-stellated. The existence of $k$-stellated spheres which are not $k$-stacked remains an open question. We also consider the class ${\cal W}_k(d)$ (and ${\cal K}_k(d)$) of simplicial complexes all whose vertex-links belong to $Σ_k(d - 1)$ (respectively, ${\cal S}_k(d - 1)$). Thus, ${\cal W}_k(d) \subseteq {\cal K}_k(d)$ for $d \geq 2k$, while ${\cal W}_1(d) = {\cal K}_1(d)$. Let $\bar{\cal K}_k(d)$ denote the class of $d$-dimensional complexes all whose vertex-links are $k$-stacked balls. We show that for $d\geq 2k + 2$, there is a natural bijection $M \mapsto \bar{M}$ from ${\cal K}_k(d)$ onto $\bar{\cal K}_k(d + 1)$ which is the inverse to the boundary map $\partial \colon \bar{\cal K}_k(d + 1) \to {\cal K}_k(d)$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.