Paper detail

On John's test for sphericity in large panel data models

This paper studies John&#39;s test for sphericity of the error terms in large panel data models, where the number of cross-section units $n$ is large enough to be comparable to the number of times series observations $T$, or even larger. Based on recent random matrix theory results, John&#39;s test&#39;s asymptotic normality properties are established under both the null and the alternative hypotheses. These asymptotics are valid for general populations, i.e., not necessarily Gaussian provided certain finite moments. A fantastic phenomenon found in the paper is that John&#39;s test for panel data models possesses a powerful dimension-proof property. It keeps the same null distribution under different $(n,T)$-asymptotics, i.e., the small or medium panel regime $n/T\to 0$ as $T\to \infty$, the large panel regime $n/T\to c \in (0,\infty)$ as $ T\to \infty$, and the ultra-large panel regime $n/T\to \infty (T^δ/n =O_p(1), 1<δ<2)$ as $T\to \infty$. Moreover, John&#39;s test is always consistent except under the alternative of bounded-norm covariance with the large panel regime $n/T\to c \in (0,\infty)$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.