On Isometric Embedding ℓpm→S∞n\ell_p^m\to S_\infty^n and Unique operator space structure

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

We study existence of linear isometric embedding of ℓpm\ell_p^m into S∞,S_\infty, for 1≤p<∞1\leq p< \infty and unique operator space structure on two dimensional Banach spaces. For p∈(2,∞)∪{1},p\in(2,\infty)\cup\{1\}, we show that indeed ℓp2\ell_p^2 does not embed isometrically into S∞S_\infty. This verifies a guess of Pisier and broadly generalizes the main result of \cite{GUR18}. We also show that S1mS_1^m does not embed isometrically into SpnS_p^n for all 1<p<∞1<p<\infty and m≥2m\geq 2. As a consequence, we establish noncommutative analogue of some of the results in \cite{LYS04}. We also show that (C2,∥.∥Bp,q)(\mathbb{C}^2,\|.\|_{B_{p,q}}) does not embed isometrically into S∞S_\infty for 2<p,q<∞.2<p,q<\infty. The main ingredients in our proofs are notions of Birkhoff-James orthogonality and norm parallelism for operators on Hilbert spaces. These enable us to deploy `infinite descent' type of arguments to obtain contradictions. Our approach is new even in the commutative case. We prove that (C2,∥.∥Bp,q)(\mathbb{C}^2,\|.\|_{B_{p,q}}) does not have unique operator space structure whenever (p,q)∈(1,∞)×[1,∞)∪[1,∞)×(1,∞)(p,q)\in(1,\infty)\times[1,\infty)\cup[1,\infty)\times(1,\infty) by showing that they do not have Property P or two summing property. In view of \cite{MIPV19}, this produces genuinely new examples of two dimensional Banach spaces without unique operator space structure, providing a partial answer to a question of Paulsen. In this case, we derive our result by transferring the problem to real case and applying known results of \cite{ARFJS95}.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.