On infinite-dimensional state spaces

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Abstract

It is well-known that the canonical commutation relation [x,p]=i[x,p]=i can be realized only on an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space. While any finite set of experimental data can also be explained in terms of a finite-dimensional Hilbert space by approximating the commutation relation, Occam's razor prefers the infinite-dimensional model in which [x,p]=i[x,p]=i holds on the nose. This reasoning one will necessarily have to make in any approach which tries to detect the infinite-dimensionality. One drawback of using the canonical commutation relation for this purpose is that it has unclear operational meaning. Here, we identify an operationally well-defined context from which an analogous conclusion can be drawn: if two unitary transformations U,VU,V on a quantum system satisfy the relation V−1U2V=U3V^{-1}U^2V=U^3, then finite-dimensionality entails the relation UV−1UV=V−1UVUUV^{-1}UV=V^{-1}UVU; this implication strongly fails in some infinite-dimensional realizations. This is a result from combinatorial group theory for which we give a new proof. This proof adapts to the consideration of cases where the assumed relation V−1U2V=U3V^{-1}U^2V=U^3 holds only up to $\eps$ and then yields a lower bound on the dimension.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.