Paper detail

On Global $\mathcal P$-Forms

Let $\Bbb F_q$ be a finite field with $\text{char}\,\Bbb F_q=p$ and $n>0$ an integer with $\text{gcd}(n, \log_pq)=1$. Let $(\ )^*:\Bbb F_q({\tt x}_0,\dots,{\tt x}_{n-1})\to\Bbb F_q({\tt x}_0,\dots,{\tt x}_{n-1})$ be the $\Bbb F_q$-monomorphism defined by ${\tt x}_i^*={\tt x}_{i+1}$ for $0\le i< n-1$ and ${\tt x}_{n-1}^*={\tt x}_0^q$. For $f,g\in\Bbb F_q({\tt x}_0,\dots,{\tt x}_{n-1})\setminus\Bbb F_q$, define $f\circ g=f(g,g^*,\dots,g^{(n-1)*})$. Then $(\Bbb F_q({\tt x}_0,\dots,{\tt x}_{n-1})\setminus\Bbb F_q,\,\circ)$ is a monoid whose invertible elements are called global $\mathcal P$-forms. Global $\mathcal P$-forms were first introduced by H. Dobbertin in 2001 with $q=2$ to study certain type of permutation polynomials of $\Bbb F_{2^m}$ with $\text{gcd}(m,n)=1$; global $\mathcal P$-forms with $q=p$ for an arbitrary prime $p$ were considered by W. More in 2005. In this paper, we discuss some fundamental questions about global $\mathcal P$-forms, some of which are answered and others remain open.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.