Paper detail

On finding solutions of a Kirchhoff type problem

Consider the following Kirchhoff type problem $$ \left\{\aligned -\bigg(a+b\int_{\mathbb{B}_R}|\nabla u|^2dx\bigg)Δu&= λu^{q-1} + μu^{p-1}, &\quad \text{in}\mathbb{B}_R, \\ u&>0,&\quad\text{in}\mathbb{B}_R,\\ u&=0,&\quad\text{on}\partial\mathbb{B}_R, \endaligned \right.\eqno{(\mathcal{P})} $$ where $\mathbb{B}_R\subset \bbr^N(N\geq3)$ is a ball, $2\leq q<p\leq2^*:=\frac{2N}{N-2}$ and $a$, $b$, $λ$, $μ$ are positive parameters. By introducing some new ideas and using the well-known results of the problem $(\mathcal{P})$ in the cases of $a=μ=1$ and $b=0$, we obtain some special kinds of solutions to $(\mathcal{P})$ for all $N\geq3$ with precise expressions on the parameters $a$, $b$, $λ$, $μ$, which reveals some new phenomenons of the solutions to the problem $(\mathcal{P})$. It is also worth to point out that it seems to be the first time that the solutions of $(\mathcal{P})$ can be expressed precisely on the parameters $a$, $b$, $λ$, $μ$, and our results in dimension four also give a partial answer to Neimen's open problems [J. Differential Equations, 257 (2014), 1168--1193]. Furthermore, our results in dimension four seems to be almost "optimal".

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.