Paper detail

On Extracting Heavy Quark Parameters from Moments with Cuts

We point out that applying the photon energy cut significantly modifies the moments of energy spectrum in B->X_s+gamma decays, with a certain class of effects not accounted for in the mostly used OPE expressions. This leads to a systematic bias in the extracted values of the b quark mass and other heavy quark parameters. The apparent b quark mass increases typically by 70MeV or more, together with an even more dramatic downward shift in the kinetic expectation value. Accounting for these cut-related shifts brings different measurements into a good agreement, when the OPE-based theory employs the robust approach. These nonperturbative effects are exponential in the effective hardness severely lowered by high cuts, and do not signify a breakdown of the 1/m_b expansion itself. Similar effects in semileptonic b->c decays are briefly addressed. We stress the utility of the second moment of E_gamma once these effects are incorporated.

preprint2003arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.