Paper detail

On estimation of the noise variance in high-dimensional probabilistic principal component analysis

In this paper, we develop new statistical theory for probabilistic principal component analysis models in high dimensions. The focus is the estimation of the noise variance, which is an important and unresolved issue when the number of variables is large in comparison with the sample size. We first unveil the reasons of a widely observed downward bias of the maximum likelihood estimator of the variance when the data dimension is high. We then propose a bias-corrected estimator using random matrix theory and establish its asymptotic normality. The superiority of the new (bias-corrected) estimator over existing alternatives is first checked by Monte-Carlo experiments with various combinations of $(p, n)$ (dimension and sample size). In order to demonstrate further potential benefits from the results of the paper to general probability PCA analysis, we provide evidence of net improvements in two popular procedures (Ulfarsson and Solo, 2008; Bai and Ng, 2002) for determining the number of principal components when the respective variance estimator proposed by these authors is replaced by the bias-corrected estimator. The new estimator is also used to derive new asymptotics for the related goodness-of-fit statistic under the high-dimensional scheme.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.