Paper detail

On Enflo and narrow operators acting on $L_p$

The first part of the paper is inspired by a theorem of H. Rosenthal, that if an operator on $L_1[0,1]$ satisfies the assumption that for each measurable set $A \subseteq [0,1]$ the restriction $T \bigl|_{L_1(A)}$ is not an isomorphic embedding, then the operator is narrow. (Here $L_1(A) = \bigl\{x \in L_1: \,\, {\rm supp} \, x \subseteq A \bigr\}$.) This leads to a natural question of finding mildest possible assumptions for operators on a given space $X$, which will imply that the operator is narrow. We find a partial answer to this question for operators on $L_p(0,1)$ with $1<p<2$. Namely we define a notion of a "gentle" growth of a function and we prove that for $1 < p < 2$ every operator $T$ on $L_p$ which is unbounded from below on $L_p(A)$, $A \subseteq [0,1]$, by means of function having a "gentle" growth, is narrow. In the second part of the paper we consider the question for what Banach spaces $X$, every operator $T:L_p \lra X$ is narrow. We prove that for $2 < p, r < \infty$ every operator $T: L_p\rightarrow\ell_r$ is narrow, which completes the list of results for operators from $L_p$ to sequence and function Lebesgue spaces.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.