Paper detail

On dimension and regularity of bundle measures

In this paper we quantify the notion of antisymmetry of the Fourier transform of certain vector valued measures. The introduced scale is related to the condition appearing in Uchiyama's theorem and is used to give a lower bound for the rectifiable dimension of those measures. Moreover, we obtain an estimate of the lower Hausdorff dimension assuming certain more restrictive version of the $2$-wave cone condition. Results of our considerations can be viewed as an uncertainty-type principle in the following way: it is impossible to simultaneously localize a (bundle) measure and a direction of its Fourier transform on small sets. The investigated class is modeled on the example of gradients of BV functions. The article contains also a theorem concerning regularity: we prove that elements of considered class vanish on 1-purely unrectifiable sets. Our results can be applied to studying the properties of PDE-constrainted measures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.