Paper detail

On cubic action of a rank one group

We consider a rank one group $G = \langle A,B \rangle $ which acts cubically on a module $V$, this means $[V,A,A,A] =0$ but $[V,G,G,G] \ne 0$. We have to distinguish whether the group $A_0 :=C_A([V,A]) \cap C_A(V/C_V(A))$ is trivial or not. We show that if $A_0$ is trivial, $G$ is a rank one group associated to a quadratic Jordan division algebra. If $A_0$ is not trivial (which is always the case if $A$ is not abelian), then $A_0$ defines a subgroup $G_0$ of $G$ which acts quadratically on $V$. We will call $G_0$ the \textit{quadratic kernel} of $G$. By a result of Timmesfeld we have $G_0 \cong \SL_2(J,R)$ for a ring $R$ and a special quadratic Jordan division algebra $J \subseteq R$. We show that $J$ is either a Jordan algebra contained in a commutative field or a hermitian Jordan algebra. In the second case $G$ is the special unitary group of a pseudo-quadratic form $π$ of Witt index $1$, in the first case $G$ is the rank one group for a Freudenthal triple system. These results imply that if $(V,G)$ is a quadratic pair such that no two distinct root groups commute and $\characteristic V\ne 2,3$, then $G$ is a unitary group or an exceptional algebraic group.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.