On complemented copies of c0(ω1)c_0(ω_1) in C(Kn)C(K^n) spaces

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

Given a compact Hausdorff space KK we consider the Banach space of real continuous functions C(Kn)C(K^n) or equivalently the nn-fold injective tensor product ⨂^εC(K)\hat\bigotimes_{\varepsilon}C(K) or the Banach space of vector valued continuous functions C(K,C(K,C(K...,C(K)...)C(K, C(K, C(K ..., C(K)...). We address the question of the existence of complemented copies of c0(ω1)c_0(ω_1) in ⨂^εC(K)\hat\bigotimes_{\varepsilon}C(K) under the hypothesis that C(K)C(K) contains an isomorphic copy of c0(ω1)c_0(ω_1). This is related to the results of E. Saab and P. Saab that X⊗^εYX\hat\otimes_\varepsilon Y contains a complemented copy of c0c_0, if one of the infinite dimensional Banach spaces XX or YY contains a copy of c0c_0 and of E. M. Galego and J. Hagler that it follows from Martin's Maximum that if C(K)C(K) has density ω1ω_1 and contains a copy of c0(ω1)c_0(ω_1), then C(K×K)C(K\times K) contains a complemented copy c0(ω1)c_0(ω_1). The main result is that under the assumption of ♣\clubsuit for every n∈Nn\in N there is a compact Hausdorff space KnK_n of weight ω1ω_1 such that C(K)C(K) is Lindelöf in the weak topology, C(Kn)C(K_n) contains a copy of c0(ω1)c_0(ω_1), C(Knn)C(K_n^n) does not contain a complemented copy of c0(ω1)c_0(ω_1) while C(Knn+1)C(K_n^{n+1}) does contain a complemented copy of c0(ω1)c_0(ω_1). This shows that additional set-theoretic assumptions in Galego and Hagler's nonseparable version of Cembrano and Freniche's theorem are necessary as well as clarifies in the negative direction the matter unsettled in a paper of Dow, Junnila and Pelant whether half-pcc Banach spaces must be weakly pcc.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.