Paper detail

On bisecants of Rédei type blocking sets and applications

We use polynomial techniques to derive structural results on Rédei type blocking sets from information on their bisecants. We apply our results to point sets of $PG(2,q)$ with few odd-secants. In particular, we improve the lower bound of Balister, Bollobás, Füredi and Thompson on the number of odd-secants of a $(q+2)$-set in $PG(2,q)$ and we answer a related open question of Vandendriessche. We prove structural results for semiovals and derive the non existence of semiovals of size $q+3$ when 3 does not divide $q$ and $q>5$. This extends a result of Blokhuis who classified semiovals of size $q+2$, and a result of Bartoli who classified semiovals of size $q+3$ when $q\leq 17$. In the $q$ even case we can say more applying a result of Szőnyi and Weiner about the stability of sets of even type. We also obtain new proof to a result of Gács and Weiner about $(q+t,t)$-arcs of type $(0,2,t)$ and to one part of a result of Ball, Blokhuis, Brouwer, Storme and Szőnyi about functions over $GF(q)$ determining less than $(q+3)/2$ directions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.