Paper detail

On Bahadur Efficiency of Power Divergence Statistics

It is proved that the information divergence statistic is infinitely more Bahadur efficient than the power divergence statistics of the orders $α>1$ as long as the sequence of alternatives is contiguous with respect to the sequence of null-hypotheses and the the number of observations per bin increases to infinity is not very slow. This improves the former result in Harremoës and Vajda (2008) where the the sequence of null-hypotheses was assumed to be uniform and the restrictions on on the numbers of observations per bin were sharper. Moreover, this paper evaluates also the Bahadur efficiency of the power divergence statistics of the remaining positive orders $0< α\leq 1.$ The statistics of these orders are mutually Bahadur-comparable and all of them are more Bahadur efficient than the statistics of the orders $α> 1.$ A detailed discussion of the technical definitions and conditions is given, some unclear points are resolved, and the results are illustrated by examples.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.