Paper detail

On Asymptotics Related to Classical Inference in Stochastic Differential Equations with Random Effects

Delattre et al. (2013) considered n independent stochastic differential equations (SDEs), where in each case the drift term is associated with a random effect, the distribution of which depends upon unknown parameters. Assuming the independent and identical (iid) situation the authors provide independent proofs of weak consistency and asymptotic normality of the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) of the hyper-parameters of their random effects parameters. In this article, as an alternative route to proving consistency and asymptotic normality in the SDE set-up involving random effects, we verify the regularity conditions required by existing relevant theorems. In particular, this approach allowed us to prove strong consistency under weaker assumption. But much more importantly, we further consider the independent, but non-identical set-up associated with the random effects based SDE framework, and prove asymptotic results associated with the MLEs.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.