Paper detail

On Astala's theorem for martingales and Fourier multipliers

We exhibit a large class of symbols $m$ on $\R^d$, $d\geq 2$, for which the corresponding Fourier multipliers $T_m$ satisfy the following inequality. If $D$, $E$ are measurable subsets of $\R^d$ with $E\subseteq D$ and $|D|<\infty$, then $$ \int_{D\setminus E} |T_{m}χ_E(x)|\mbox{d}x\leq \begin{cases} |E|+|E|\ln\left(\frac{|D|}{2|E|}\right), & \mbox{if}|E|<|D|/2, |D\setminus E|+\frac{1}{2}|D \setminus E|\ln \left(\frac{|E|}{|D\setminus E|}\right), & \mbox{if}|E|\geq |D|/2. \end{cases}. $$ Here $|\cdot|$ denotes the Lebesgue measure on $\bR^d$. When $d=2$, these multipliers include the real and imaginary parts of the Beurling-Ahlfors operator $B$ and hence the inequality is also valid for $B$ with the right-hand side multiplied by $\sqrt{2}$. The inequality is sharp for the real and imaginary parts of $B$. This work is motivated by K. Astala's celebrated results on the Gehring-Reich conjecture concerning the distortion of area by quasiconformal maps. The proof rests on probabilistic methods and exploits a family of appropriate novel sharp inequalities for differentially subordinate martingales. These martingale bounds are of interest on their own right.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.