Paper detail

On Agnostic PAC Learning using $\mathcal{L}_2$-polynomial Regression and Fourier-based Algorithms

We develop a framework using Hilbert spaces as a proxy to analyze PAC learning problems with structural properties. We consider a joint Hilbert space incorporating the relation between the true label and the predictor under a joint distribution $D$. We demonstrate that agnostic PAC learning with 0-1 loss is equivalent to an optimization in the Hilbert space domain. With our model, we revisit the PAC learning problem using methods based on least-squares such as $\mathcal{L}_2$ polynomial regression and Linial's low-degree algorithm. We study learning with respect to several hypothesis classes such as half-spaces and polynomial-approximated classes (i.e., functions approximated by a fixed-degree polynomial). We prove that (under some distributional assumptions) such methods obtain generalization error up to $2opt$ with $opt$ being the optimal error of the class. Hence, we show the tightest bound on generalization error when $opt\leq 0.2$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.