Paper detail

On affirmative solution to Michael's acclaimed problem in the theory of Fréchet algebras, with applications to automatic continuity theory

In 1952, Michael posed a question about the functional continuity of commutative Frechet algebras in his memoir, known as Michael problem in the literature. We settle this in the affirmative along with its various equivalent forms, even for the non-commutative case. Indeed, we continue our recent works, and develop two approaches to directly attack these problems. The first approach is to show that the test case for this problem, the Frechet algebra of all entire functions on the Banach space of all bounded complex sequences, is, in fact, a Frechet algebra of all complex formal power series in one indeterminate, if there exists a discontinuous character. In the second approach, the existence of a discontinuous character would allow us to generate other Frechet algebra topology, inequivalent to the usual Frechet algebra topology, by applying the method of Read (he used this method to show that the famous Singer-Wermer conjecture (1955) fails in the Frechet case). In both the approaches, an important tool is a topological version of the (symmetric) tensor algebra over a Banach space; the elementary, but crucial, idea is to express the test algebra as a weighted Frechet symmetric algebra over the Banach space of all absolutely summable complex sequences. Several mathematicians have worked on two problems of Michael since 1952, giving affirmative solutions for special classes of Frechet algebras under various conditions, or discussing various test cases, or discussing various approaches, or discussing various other equivalent forms, or deriving other important automatic continuity results such as the (non-)uniqueness of the Frechet algebra topology for certain commutative Frechet algebras by alternate, difficult or lengthy methods. We summarize effects of our affirmative solutions on these attempts in addition to giving various new (important) applications in automatic continuity theory.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.