Paper detail

On adatomic-configuration-mediated correlation between electrotransport and electrochemical properties of graphene

The electron-transport properties of adatom-graphene system are investigated for different (random, correlated, and ordered) spatial configurations of adatoms over different types of high symmetry sites with various adsorption heights. K adatoms in monolayer graphene are modeled by the scattering potential adapted from the independent self-consistent ab initio calculations. The results are obtained numerically using the quantum-mechanical Kubo-Greenwood formalism. A band gap may be opened only if ordered adatoms act as substitutional atoms, while there is no band gap opening for adatoms acting as interstitial atoms. The type of adsorption sites strongly affect the conductivity for random and correlated adatoms, but practically does not change the conductivity when they form ordered superstructures with equal periods. Depending on electron density and type of adsorption sites, the conductivity for correlated and ordered adatoms is found to be enhanced in dozens of times as compared to the cases of their random positions. These the correlation and ordering effects manifest weaker or stronger depending on whether adatoms act as substitutional or interstitial atoms. The conductivity approximately linearly scales with adsorption height of random or correlated adatoms, but remains practically unchanged with adequate varying of elevation of ordered adatoms. Correlations between electron transport properties and heterogeneous electron transfer kinetics through K-doped graphene and electrolyte interface are investigated as well. The ferri-/ferrocyanide redox couple is used as an electrochemical benchmark system. K adsorption of graphene electrode results to only slight suppress of the heterogeneous standard rate constant. Band gap, opening for ordered and strongly short-range scatterers, has a strong impact on the dependence of the electrode reaction rate as a function of electrode potential.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.