Paper detail

On a Bruhat decomposition related to the Shalika subgroup of $GL(2n)$

Let $F$ be a non-archimedean local field or a finite field. In this article, we obtain an explicit and complete set of double coset representatives for $S\backslash GL_{2n}(F)/Q$ where $S$ is the Shalika subgroup and $Q$ a maximal parabolic subgroup of the group $GL_{2n}(F)$ of invertible $2n\times 2n$ matrices. We compute the cardinality of $S\backslash GL_{2n}(F)/Q$ and also give an alternate perspective on the double cosets arising intrinsically from certain subgroups which are relevant for applications in representation theory. Finally, if $Q$ is a maximal parabolic subgroup of the type $(r,2n-r),$ we prove that $S\backslash GL_{2n}(F)/Q$ is in one to one correspondence with $ΔS_n\backslash S_{2n}/S_{r}\times S_{2n-r}$ leading to a Bruhat decomposition. The results and proofs discussed in this article are valid over any arbitrary field $F$ even though our motivation is from representation theory of $p$-adic and finite linear groups.

preprint2025arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.