Paper detail

Omitted covariates bias and finite mixtures of regression models for longitudinal responses

Individual-specific, time-constant, random effects are often used to model dependence and/or to account for omitted covariates in regression models for longitudinal responses. Longitudinal studies have known a huge and widespread use in the last few years as they allow to distinguish between so-called age and cohort effects; these relate to differences that can be observed at the beginning of the study and stay persistent through time, and changes in the response that are due to the temporal dynamics in the observed covariates. While there is a clear and general agreement on this purpose, the random effect approach has been frequently criticized for not being robust to the presence of correlation between the observed (i.e. covariates) and the unobserved (i.e. random effects) heterogeneity. Starting from the so-called correlated effect approach, we argue that the random effect approach may be parametrized to account for potential correlation between observables and unobservables. Specifically, when the random effect distribution is estimated non-parametrically using a discrete distribution on finite number of locations, a further, more general, solution is developed. This is illustrated via a large scale simulation study and the analysis of a benchmark dataset.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.