Paper detail

Obscured AGB stars in the Magellanic Clouds II. Near-infrared and mid-infrared counterparts

We have carried out an infrared search for obscured AGB stars in the Magellanic Clouds. The survey uncovered a number of obscured AGB stars as well as some supergiants with infrared excess. We present photometry of the sources and discuss the colour diagrams and bolometric luminosities. Most of the AGB stars are luminous, often close to the classical limit of $M_{\rm bol}=-7.1$. To determine whether the stars are oxygen-rich or carbon-rich, we have acquired narrow-band mid-infrared photometry with the ESO TIMMI camera for several sources. All but one are found to show the silicate feature and therefore to have oxygen-rich dust: the colours of the remaining source are consistent with either an oxygen-rich or a carbon-rich nature. A method to distinguish carbon and oxygen stars based on H$-$K versus K$-$[12] colours is presented. We discuss several methods of calculating the mass-loss rate: for the AGB stars the mass-loss rates vary between approximately 5 times 10**-4 and 5 times 10**-6 solar masses per year, depending on assumed dust-to-gas mass ratio. We present a new way to calculate mass-loss rates from the OH-maser emission. We find no evidence for a correlation of the mass-loss rates with luminosity in these obscured stars. Neither do the mass-loss rates for the LMC and SMC stars differ in any clear systematic way from each other. Expansion velocities appear to be slightly lower in the LMC than in the Galaxy. Period determinations are discussed for two sources: the periods are comparable to those of the longer-period galactic OH/IR stars. All of the luminous stars for which periods are available, have significantly higher luminosities than predicted from the period--luminosity relations.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.