Source author record

Cecile Loup

Cecile Loup appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

astro-ph astro-ph.IM

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Best Practices for Data Publication in the Astronomical Literature

We present an overview of best practices for publishing data in astronomy and astrophysics journals. These recommendations are intended as a reference for authors to help prepare and publish data in a way that will better represent and support science results, enable better data sharing, improve reproducibility, and enhance the reusability of data. Observance of these guidelines will also help to streamline the extraction, preservation, integration and cross-linking of valuable data from astrophysics literature into major astronomical databases, and consequently facilitate new modes of science discovery that will better exploit the vast quantities of panchromatic and multi-dimensional data associated with the literature. We encourage authors, journal editors, referees, and publishers to implement the best practices reviewed here, as well as related recommendations from international astronomical organizations such as the International Astronomical Union (IAU) for publication of nomenclature, data, and metadata. A convenient Checklist of Recommendations for Publishing Data in the Literature is included for authors to consult before the submission of the final version of their journal articles and associated data files. We recommend that publishers of journals in astronomy and astrophysics incorporate a link to this document in their Instructions to Authors.

preprint2005arXiv

An empirical formula for the mass-loss rates of dust-enshrouded red supergiants and oxygen-rich Asymptotic Giant Branch stars

We present an empirical determination of the mass-loss rate as a function of stellar luminosity and effective temperature, for oxygen-rich dust-enshrouded Asymptotic Giant Branch stars and red supergiants. To this aim we obtained optical spectra of a sample of dust-enshrouded red giants in the Large Magellanic Cloud, which we complemented with spectroscopic and infrared photometric data from the literature. Two of these turned out to be hot emission-line stars, of which one is a definite B[e] star. The mass-loss rates were measured through modelling of the spectral energy distributions. We thus obtain the mass-loss rate formula log Mdot = -5.65 + 1.05 log(L / 10,000 Lsun) -6.3 log(Teff / 3500 K), valid for dust-enshrouded red supergiants and oxygen-rich AGB stars. Despite the low metallicity of the LMC, both AGB stars and red supergiants are found at late spectral types. A comparison with galactic AGB stars and red supergiants shows excellent agreement between the mass-loss rate as predicted by our formula and that derived from the 60 micron flux density for dust-enshrouded objects, but not for optically bright objects. We discuss the possible implications of this for the mass-loss mechanism.

preprint1997arXiv

Obscured Asymptotic Giant Branch stars in the Magellanic Clouds III. New IRAS counterparts

We have searched for near-infrared stellar counterparts of IRAS point sources in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), in J and K-bands. This resulted in the detection of 21 counterparts, of which 19 are new discoveries. Using colour-magnitude and colour-colour diagrams, we identify 13 Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) stars with thick circumstellar dust envelopes, 7 possible early post-AGB stars or stars recovering from a thermal pulse, and 1 red supergiant or foreground star. For 10 of the IRAS targets we do not succeed in detecting and/or identifying a near-infrared counterpart. We serendipitously detect 14 other red sources, of which 2 are known Long Period Variables, and a few galaxies. The near-infrared and optical colours of the galaxies may indicate considerable interstellar extinction through the LMC, as much as A_V about 2-4 mag. The relative number of AGB carbon stars over oxygen stars is shown to decrease as the luminosity increases. Yet amongst the faintest mass-losing AGB stars oxygen-rich stars still exist, which puts constraints on current convection theories that predict the occurrence of third dredge-up and Hot Bottom Burning. We investigate the nature of some LMC stars that have infrared properties very similar to suspected Galactic post-AGB stars.

preprint1995arXiv

Obscured AGB stars in the Magellanic Clouds II. Near-infrared and mid-infrared counterparts

We have carried out an infrared search for obscured AGB stars in the Magellanic Clouds. The survey uncovered a number of obscured AGB stars as well as some supergiants with infrared excess. We present photometry of the sources and discuss the colour diagrams and bolometric luminosities. Most of the AGB stars are luminous, often close to the classical limit of $M_{\rm bol}=-7.1$. To determine whether the stars are oxygen-rich or carbon-rich, we have acquired narrow-band mid-infrared photometry with the ESO TIMMI camera for several sources. All but one are found to show the silicate feature and therefore to have oxygen-rich dust: the colours of the remaining source are consistent with either an oxygen-rich or a carbon-rich nature. A method to distinguish carbon and oxygen stars based on H$-$K versus K$-$[12] colours is presented. We discuss several methods of calculating the mass-loss rate: for the AGB stars the mass-loss rates vary between approximately 5 times 10**-4 and 5 times 10**-6 solar masses per year, depending on assumed dust-to-gas mass ratio. We present a new way to calculate mass-loss rates from the OH-maser emission. We find no evidence for a correlation of the mass-loss rates with luminosity in these obscured stars. Neither do the mass-loss rates for the LMC and SMC stars differ in any clear systematic way from each other. Expansion velocities appear to be slightly lower in the LMC than in the Galaxy. Period determinations are discussed for two sources: the periods are comparable to those of the longer-period galactic OH/IR stars. All of the luminous stars for which periods are available, have significantly higher luminosities than predicted from the period--luminosity relations.