Paper detail

Objective frequentist uncertainty quantification for atmospheric CO$_2$ retrievals

The steadily increasing amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO$_2$) is affecting the global climate system and threatening the long-term sustainability of Earth's ecosystem. In order to better understand the sources and sinks of CO$_2$, NASA operates the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 & 3 satellites to monitor CO$_2$ from space. These satellites make passive radiance measurements of the sunlight reflected off the Earth's surface in different spectral bands, which are then inverted in an ill-posed inverse problem to obtain estimates of the atmospheric CO$_2$ concentration. In this work, we propose a new CO$_2$ retrieval method that uses known physical constraints on the state variables and direct inversion of the target functional of interest to construct well-calibrated frequentist confidence intervals based on convex programming. We compare the method with the current operational retrieval procedure, which uses prior knowledge in the form of probability distributions to regularize the problem. We demonstrate that the proposed intervals consistently achieve the desired frequentist coverage, while the operational uncertainties are poorly calibrated in a frequentist sense both at individual locations and over a spatial region in a realistic simulation experiment. We also study the influence of specific nuisance state variables on the length of the proposed intervals and identify certain key variables that can greatly reduce the final uncertainty given additional deterministic or probabilistic constraints, and develop a principled framework to incorporate such information into our method.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.